Tuesday, 17 November 2009

Is it just me?

Is it just me or has anyone else noticed that the general dumbing-down has affected museums as much as anywhere? Beautiful Victorian buildings that used to be the safe haven for thousands of fascinating and curious objects collected by indefatigable researchers and travellers now look more like a vaguely academic version of  "The X Factor" or "I'm a Celebrity - Get me out of here."

I went all the way to Hove Museum today (1-1/2 hours each way) to look at what was billed as a prehistory exhibit and one of the better collections of flint implements.  The exhibit was a single case with no information content of any substance and from which the best items had been removed for unspecified 'conservation purposes'.  Even this feeble showing was better than Portsmouth City Museum.  I visited it a few week ago to see the prehistoric exhibit only to be told that it had been temporarily replaced by an exhibit on Arthur Conan Doyle, creator of Sherlock Holmes and a son of Portsmouth.  When I asked the lady behind the counter when the prehistory exhibit would be restored, she looked vaguely bemused and told that 'there are no plans to restore it' as the Doyle exhibition was to be made permanent.

Am I really alone in finding it a little odd that three-quarters of a million years of human pre-history should be wiped out completely in favour of a popular novelist who died in 1930?

Somewhere in Britain there is someone running a course entitled something like "Museum Curatorship in The Twenty First Century".  Whoever he or she is - and if I ever get my hands on them I won't be responsible for the consequences - is addressing his students something like this.  "30 years ago, museums were boring, smelly old buildings crammed full of so much Victorian rubbish no-one could take it all in.  It was visually meaningless, and everything was explained with long, hard-to-understand text labels that were fine when everyone read books but no-one reads today because they all watch telly.  So what we need is modern, airy, spacious, brightly lit rooms that attract young people.  Less is More.  Get rid of the clutter - cherry-pick a few of your best items and put them in well-lit cases with a minimum of boring wordage and plenty of visual cues - blow up some photographs.  Get the kids involved.  Have lots of interactive stuff - try on Victorian clothes or Roman togas or Saxon armour.  Design your dream house.  Look at a fly's eye through a microscope. Take all that old crap that the well-meaning anoraks have donated to the museum and stack it in crates in the basement.  No one will ever know, and more important no one will ever care."

Well, I care.  I'd like to take all the cool, modern museum curators and stack them in the basement where no one will ever hear from them again, and replace their interactive displays with the material from the basement, including the politically incorrect stuffed birds and the butterflies and the other archetypes that tell us what to look for and where to look for it, instead of just filling an hour or two until Coronation Street comes on.

2 comments:

  1. I feel exactly the same way. btw I believe your hammerstone is not a hammerstone but a pecking stone. That's battering wear, not striking blades wear. Flint on flint is a bad idea, get something in your eyes.

    ReplyDelete
  2. 'Yes. Help yourself to anything on my web site.' was the helpful response I received from Richard after my enquiry, re., access to Stone Age artefacts for photography. This was after sending the same enquiry to 13 Scottish Museums all of which gave me a completely negative response. Material is in inaccessible storage. We don't have anything. Could you perhaps come back in two years time? We will be putting on a display then. etc., etc.
    I grew up with an utter sense of wonder at some of the so called dust covered collections and displays of Scottish Museums of the 1950's. Now I am faced with the Coke cans and guitars of today's pop culture. Very sad. Why must everything be big and shiny?
    More power to your arm Richard.

    ReplyDelete